Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-24 Thread Dustin Huptas
Hi Willi, Willi Mann schrieb: [..] This description suggests that you get the reject_warning and reject because you have two rules, one with warn_if_reject and one without. Can you confirm that? I can confirm this. My main.cf has the following two lines: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = [..]

Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-23 Thread Willi Mann
Dustin Huptas schrieb: Hi Willi, sorry for the late feedback, here are the corresponding log lines: Jul 4 13:04:04 saturn postfix/smtpd[22767]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning:RCPT from host[x.x.x.x]: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected: Domain not found; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[E

Bug#317388: [Logwatch-Devel] fwd: Re: Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-23 Thread Who Knows
Willi Mann wrote: But you didn't find out out whether the reject_warning line is redundant and what's the difference between the two. Before anyone can seriously apply the patch, we need to know that. Of course, from the original report, it's very likely that it's another line which would be

Bug#317388: [Logwatch-Devel] fwd: Re: Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-23 Thread Willi Mann
Who Knows schrieb: Willi Mann wrote: Could anyone who is used to postfix look at this bug please? I'm not sure what to do with this bug. http://bugs.debian.org/317388 Willi I just installed the latest logwatch, and believe the enclosed patch will correct this issue. I couldn't find any r

Bug#317388: [Logwatch-Devel] fwd: Re: Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-23 Thread Willi Mann
apply the patch, we need to know that. Of course, from the original report, it's very likely that it's another line which would be what you intended in your patch, because of the "big" difference in the two reporting dates (33 secs), but I don't know that for sure. Forget that statement, it'

Bug#317388: [Logwatch-Devel] fwd: Re: Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-23 Thread Who Knows
Willi Mann wrote: Could anyone who is used to postfix look at this bug please? I'm not sure what to do with this bug. http://bugs.debian.org/317388 Willi I just installed the latest logwatch, and believe the enclosed patch will correct this issue. I couldn't find any reject_warning in my l

Bug#317388: fwd: Re: Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-14 Thread Willi Mann
forwarded 317388 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Hi! Could anyone who is used to postfix look at this bug please? I'm not sure what to do with this bug. http://bugs.debian.org/317388 Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-13 Thread Dustin Huptas
Hi Willi, sorry for the late feedback, here are the corresponding log lines: Jul 4 13:04:04 saturn postfix/smtpd[22767]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning:RCPT from host[x.x.x.x]: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected: Domain not found; from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ES

Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-10 Thread Willi Mann
Dustin Huptas schrieb: Package: logwatch Version: 6.1.2-1 Severity: normal In the Postfix section I am having the following unmatched entries: - postfix Begin Messages rejected: Domain not found 1 Time(s) host[x.x.x.x] 1 Time(s)

Bug#317388: logwatch: Unmatched entries in Postfix section

2005-07-07 Thread Dustin Huptas
Package: logwatch Version: 6.1.2-1 Severity: normal In the Postfix section I am having the following unmatched entries: - postfix Begin Messages rejected: Domain not found 1 Time(s) host[x.x.x.x] 1 Time(s) **Unmatched Entries** NOQ