On Wed 13 Jul 2005, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:21:46PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
Please, *please* look at existing bugs before sending in a bug report.
E.g. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=32379
I did look at the existing reports, and that (and the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:54:26AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
It would be nice if rsync linked against the shared zlib instead of
linking in its own static copy.
This to me implies that that bug report is also concerned about rsync
using its own (static) copy of zlib...
Static linking and
On Wed 13 Jul 2005, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:54:26AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
It would be nice if rsync linked against the shared zlib instead of
linking in its own static copy.
This to me implies that that bug report is also concerned about rsync
using its own
Package: rsync
Version: 2.6.5-1
Severity: important
The upstream rsync package includes a copy of zlib and unconditionally
uses it during the build. This means that any security updates to zlib
need to be independantly applied to this package.
Ideally the configure script should detect if zlib
4 matches
Mail list logo
