Jeroen van Wolffelaar schrieb am Mittwoch, den 17. Januar 2007:
severity 318123 important
thanks
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:36:02AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
The best solution for now is probably just to conflict with
libpam-opensc
NMU'd with this 'solution' -- downgrading this bug
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:04:09AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar schrieb am Mittwoch, den 17. Januar 2007:
severity 318123 important
thanks
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:36:02AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
The best solution for now is probably just to conflict with
severity 318123 important
thanks
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:36:02AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
The best solution for now is probably just to conflict with
libpam-opensc
NMU'd with this 'solution' -- downgrading this bug and its sister one
accordingly. I don't consider this bug adequately
tags 318123 - patch
thanks
10:55 Joey aba: fyi, patch in #318123 reichte evtl. nicht. Wenn das
der patch ist, den wir auch fuer security hatten, reicht der nicht,
weshalb es auch kein DSA gegeben hat.
10:56 Joey jwz hat auch eine neue version kuerzlich herausgegeben iirc.
10:56 aba Joey:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:01:01AM +0100, you wrote:
(Summary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] says patch in #318123 is insufficient)
No shit; I said that when I first saw the patch. The best solution for
now is probably just to conflict with libpam-opensc; there's some work
on rearchitecting the pam
5 matches
Mail list logo