On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:43:43PM -0400, Ariel wrote:
>
> Is there any combination of inode parameters that could cause this? (i.e.
> fsck needs to be run twice, never mind how the fs got there?) It looks to
> my uneducated eye that the only real error is that i_links_count was 0
> instead of
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:46:42AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.37-2
Severity: important
This was running on a system with a ro / fs changed via remount to rw.
(So /etc/mtab was not real, since nothing rewrote it afterward.)
I don
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:46:42AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.37-2
> Severity: important
>
> This was running on a system with a ro / fs changed via remount to rw.
> (So /etc/mtab was not real, since nothing rewrote it afterward.)
> I don't know if this is relevant - sin
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.37-2
Severity: important
This was running on a system with a ro / fs changed via remount to rw.
(So /etc/mtab was not real, since nothing rewrote it afterward.)
I don't know if this is relevant - since I did the exact same thing in
the same session to another fs, and
4 matches
Mail list logo
