On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-9
Severity: normal
infocmp xterm-color says kdch1=\177 though the delete-character key
returns \E[3~.
There's no need to change this, since as noted in the comments in
terminfo.src, it does not correspond to any
On 2005-07-23 07:09:13 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
infocmp xterm-color says kdch1=\177 though the delete-character
key returns \E[3~.
There's no need to change this, since as noted in the comments in
terminfo.src, it does not correspond to any
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2005-07-23 07:09:13 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
infocmp xterm-color says kdch1=\177 though the delete-character
key returns \E[3~.
There's no need to change this, since as noted in the comments in
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 07:09:13AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-9
Severity: normal
infocmp xterm-color says kdch1=\177 though the delete-character key
returns \E[3~.
There's no need to change this, since
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 07:09:13AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-9
Severity: normal
infocmp xterm-color says kdch1=\177 though the delete-character key
returns
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2005-07-23 09:38:31 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
hmm - a quick glance at the code shows this is another of the ones that
claim it's xterm-compatible (I see some xterm and vt100 literals).
I'd suggest testing that theory with vttest. The only
On 2005-07-23 09:38:31 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
hmm - a quick glance at the code shows this is another of the ones that
claim it's xterm-compatible (I see some xterm and vt100 literals).
I'd suggest testing that theory with vttest. The only mention of vttest
in the changelog is two
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2005-07-23 09:38:31 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
hmm - a quick glance at the code shows this is another of the ones that
claim it's xterm-compatible (I see some xterm and vt100 literals).
I'd suggest testing that theory with vttest. The only
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:44:49AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
I'm a bit confused really; the xterm-r6 definition in misc/terminfo.src
has kdch1=\E[3~. The xterm-r6 definition in debian/xterm.ti has
kdch1=\177, and I'm pretty sure we get that from the xterm source
distribution... I wonder
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Since the terminfo shipped with xterm is primarily of interest for the
real and current xterm, and the terminfo shipped with ncurses is
supposed to cover a wide variety of all kinds of oddball terminals, I
am inclined to take only the entries
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-9
Severity: normal
infocmp xterm-color says kdch1=\177 though the delete-character key
returns \E[3~.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
11 matches
Mail list logo
