Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reopen 321959 thanks On 2005-08-13 23:23:06 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Are you sure? Here is the control file: [...] The problem is still there. If all is correct in the source, perhaps the packages should be rebuilt? BTW, http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libselinux.html says:

Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-14 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2005-08-13 23:23:06 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Are you sure? Here is the control file: Yes: dixsept:~ dpkg -s libselinux1-dev Package: libselinux1-dev Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 856 Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reopen 321959 thanks The sections are still incorrect in the 1.24-4 packages. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To

Bug#321959: Bad section for libselinux1-dev and selinux-utils

2005-08-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: libselinux Severity: minor libselinux1-dev should be in Section libdevel and selinux-utils should probably be in Section admin (instead of libs). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: