Bug#322593:

2007-12-05 Thread Andres Mejia
part of bug +322593. + * Added instruction on optional use of GnuPG. Closes: #454100 + * Added Homepage and Vcs entries in control file. Closes: #453905 + * Changed debpool recommends leaving out libdigest-md5-perl. Closes: #454102 + * Fixed problem with missing newlines in .package files

Bug#322593:

2007-12-04 Thread Andres Mejia
I was able to upload binary only uploads with success starting with debpool-0.2.3. The problem I received however is that whenever I uploaded for one arch, that arch would get their package entries added in the appropriate Packages file and all other archs' Packages file would get their entries

Bug#322593:

2007-12-04 Thread Andres Mejia
Here's a revised patch that will now write package and/or log entries depending on whether the package is installed for an arch. Again, the patch contains fixes for other problems so the relevant fixes for this bug are with hunks 2, 3, 4, and 6. I'm wondering if a .package file or .source file is

Bug#322593:

2007-12-04 Thread Andres Mejia
Apparently I had a misunderstanding of what a binary only upload was. I thought it was only when the orig.tar.gz information was left out. Here's yet another patch that will really address the binary only upload issue. For the record, I've tested this by uploading packages with the orig tarball,

Bug#322593:

2007-12-02 Thread Andres Mejia
This will ensure there's support for udebs. my($filepat) = qr/^\Q${package}_\E.*\Q_${arch}.\Eu?deb/; -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322593: debpool seems to be unable to handle binary-only uploads

2007-04-07 Thread Magnus Holmgren
One problem I found is in line 988 in Packages.pm, the regexp there matches only the first + in the Package name. Unfortunately I use multiple + in the Version-String appended to my kernel and as I'm building with kernel-package this string is part of the package name, resulting in:

Bug#322593: debpool seems to be unable to handle binary-only uploads

2005-08-13 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 11.Aug 2005 - 18:59:54, Andreas Pakulat wrote: I have not had the time to check the source, but I hope I get a change later today. One problem I found is in line 988 in Packages.pm, the regexp there matches only the first + in the Package name. Unfortunately I use multiple + in the

Bug#322593: debpool seems to be unable to handle binary-only uploads

2005-08-11 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Package: debpool Version: 0.2.2 Severity: important Hi, It seems that current debpool in unstable is not able to handle a binary-only upload. The symptom of this is an empty package file, but it's _not_ #320062, as I do have a filled @sources-Array in Generate_List. The problem seems to be that