On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:51:08PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> yes, the buildd's cannot automatically choose a virtual
> package.
Makes sense once you know it and start thinking about it. :-)
> please look at the policy for details (do not depend on a
> virtual package alone).
I couldn't find
Martin Buck writes:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version
> > will be removed from the archive in the near future.
> > Please change your build dependencies to
> >
> > libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version
> will be removed from the archive in the near future.
> Please change your build dependencies to
>
> libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev
Is there a good reason why I sh
Package: apcalc
The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version
will be removed from the archive in the near future.
Please change your build dependencies to
libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev
Please raise the severity of this bug report to serious,
if the package cannot be built
4 matches
Mail list logo
