Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2007-02-21 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christoph, sorry for the last answere. I was not at home. Am Di den 13. Feb 2007 um 18:08 schrieb Christoph Berg: Can you still confirm the behavior you reported in #327875 with the latest mutt 1.5.13 packages? It seems to work now. So there

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2007-02-13 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Klaus Ethgen 2005-10-01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I did some debugging and also using the newest package 1.5.11-2. The relevant part are: Hi Klaus, sorry for the late followup. Can you still confirm the behavior you reported in #327875 with the latest mutt 1.5.13 packages? Christoph -- [EMAIL

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-10-01 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, The bug is just in state More information needed. Just let me know which you need. I did answer your last question time ago. Regard Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgenhttp://www.ethgen.de/ pub 2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-10-01 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I did some debugging and also using the newest package 1.5.11-2. The relevant part are: - --- first authentication --- mutt_index_menu[632]: Got op 99 imap_cmd_step: grew buffer to 512 bytes * OK IMAP4rev1 a CAPABILITY^M * CAPABILITY

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-09-21 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hoi, Am Mo den 19. Sep 2005 um 10:44 schrieb Adeodato Simó: Uhm. So, you have any idea what is making your mutt work, and Debian's Sorry, not in this case. But I think that one of the patches verschlimbessert (unfortunality I do not know a

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-09-19 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Adeadato, Am Mo den 19. Sep 2005 um 1:46 schrieb Adeodato Simó: Can you do a quick test and check whether it still happens with this 1.5.11 package?:

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-09-19 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Klaus Ethgen [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 09:21:46 +0200]: http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005-09-19/mutt-1.5.11-pre/mutt_1.5.11-1~pre1_i386.deb This do not solve the problem. Okay. Do you configure it --with-sasl or --with-sasl2? If not, that'll be I used extra the version

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-09-19 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Am Mo den 19. Sep 2005 um 10:30 schrieb Adeodato Simó: Uh? Please answer the question, does _your_ mutt (that does not fail) have SASL support compiled in? Ah, I missunderstand. I use the following switches to configure it: -

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-09-19 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Klaus Ethgen [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:40:53 +0200]: Hello, Am Mo den 19. Sep 2005 um 10:30 schrieb Adeodato Simó: Uh? Please answer the question, does _your_ mutt (that does not fail) have SASL support compiled in? Ah, I missunderstand. I use the following switches to configure it:

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-09-18 Thread Adeodato Simó
tag 327875 moreinfo thanks * Klaus Ethgen [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:16:46 +0200]: Package: mutt Version: 1.5.10-1 Severity: normal Hi, Whe using imaps://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX or imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX when selecting that mailbox mutt do not ask for a password and simply fail. If the

Bug#327875: mutt fails with sasl error the first time

2005-09-12 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: mutt Version: 1.5.10-1 Severity: normal Whe using imaps://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX or imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX when selecting that mailbox mutt do not ask for a password and simply fail. If the same mailbox is selected by c a second