On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 06:38:14AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
It looks like someone needs to replace the RSA md5 implementation with
one of the GPL-compatible ones, correct?
I'm inclined to just dump the current code and go with freebsd's
implementation of libpam-opie, just haven't had time.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 06:53:09PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
including also fixing the code to write to the wtmp
? An authentication module shouldn't be writing to wtmp.
Don't ask me why, but it does. Anyhow, the code is completely useless -- the
two calls to opielogwtmp() can be replaced by
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:46:38AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Any progress on this?
Nope.
including also fixing the code to write to the wtmp
? An authentication module shouldn't be writing to wtmp.
--
Michael Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
reassign 328923 opie
thanks
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:53:46AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
? An authentication module shouldn't be writing to wtmp.
Don't ask me why, but it does. Anyhow, the code is completely useless -- the
two calls to opielogwtmp() can be replaced by a single one to
Hi Michael,
Is anything being done about this bug? It looks like someone needs to
replace the RSA md5 implementation with one of the GPL-compatible ones,
correct?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:25:17AM -0800, you wrote:
Is anything being done about this bug?
Not really.
It looks like someone needs to replace the RSA md5 implementation with
one of the GPL-compatible ones, correct?
I'm inclined to just dump the current code and go with freebsd's
Package: libpam-opie
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The package links code licensed under the GPL to code which is covered
by licenses with advertising clauses, for example:
| License to copy and use this software is granted provided that it
| is identified as the RSA Data
7 matches
Mail list logo
