Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, is anybody else able to reproduce this issue by installing
the tetex-{base,bin,extra} packages separately one after the other?
Yes. The bug is in tetex-extra.postinst. Insert mktexlsr just before the
'if updmap 2...' and everything will work as
severity 329189 important
reassign 329189 tetex-extra
retitle 329189 tetex-extra's Type1 fonts don't work when it is installed after
tetex-bin
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 19:16:39 +0200
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- tetex-extra.updmap.err 2005-10-08 17:21:28.0 +0200
+++ tetex-extra.updmap.err-with-x-in-updmap 2005-10-08
17:22:08.0 +0200
--rw-r--r-- 1 root root 33657 2005-10-08 00:28
I forgot to include the log file of the single apt-get install tetex-extra run.
tetex-extra-apt.log
===
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
tetex-base tetex-bin texinfo
Suggested packages:
xpdf-reader pdf-viewer
Thanks for the detailed info.
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the impression that I should no longer call this a tetex bug.
Calling an executable shell script FILE starting with #!/bin/sh should
be equivalent to calling /bin/sh FILE (and afaIk the latter is exactly
what the
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting after
dpkg --purge tetex-{base,bin,extra} texinfo
it makes a difference whether I do
apt-get install tetex-bin ; apt-get install tetex-extra
(this reproduces the bug)
or just
apt-get install tetex-extra
and let it
Hi,
Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:
Simply changing the line 'if updmap 2 $tempfile; then' into
'if /bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap 2 $tempfile; then' in
tetex-extra.postinst and running 'tetex-extra.postinst configure'
gives you a different (more complete) psfonts_t1.map than
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:43:01 +0200
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:
Simply changing the line 'if updmap 2 $tempfile; then' into
'if /bin/sh /usr/bin/updmap 2 $tempfile; then' in
tetex-extra.postinst and running
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:00:24 +0200
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:43:01 +0200
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me make sure I understand what you are saying:
Simply changing the line 'if updmap 2 $tempfile; then' into
'if /bin/sh
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have purged tetex-{base,bin,extra} again and manually removed
/usr/share/texmf and /etc/texmf/. Apologies for overlooking them so far.
You shouldn't have done that. These directories are under dpkg's
control, and there are a couple of packages that put
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:28:42 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg -S usr/share/texmf/ | egrep -v 'tetex-base|tetex-bin|tetex-extra' | cut
-d ':' -f 1 | sort -u
and then for each package this lists:
apt-get --reinstall install package
Thanks for pointing that out. Indeed I
On 06.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have also useed find to seek for updmap.* files.
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:01:36 +0200
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess we should simply remove it. As the submitter already purged
the old installation we can't do dig further into this.
Arne is it to close this bug then?
As I see it the status is:
1) I cannot reproduce the
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As dlocate does not find it it was not brought in by dpkg but was
rather generated.
You forgot that we once had a symlink /usr/share/texmf/web2c -
/var/lib/texmf/web2c. It might be that some intermediate buggy version,
alone or together with a user
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) I still have to run updmap once by hand after installing tetex-extra
to cause dvips -Pwww or -Poutline to use the .pfb fonts.
Oh. That is unexpected. I think we should debug this, and for this we
need the stderr of updmap run with sh -x. I don't
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 19:01 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
Here is tetex-extra-apt.log
===
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
tetex-extra
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:16:30 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This shows that updmap is in fact executed, but it seems that it does
not do the right thing. However, it should save a detailed log of its
actions in
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know the postinst scripts of the teTeX 2 packages all that well,
but I am wondering why there is no indication of update-updmap actually
running. Although update-updmap must have run at some point, otherwise a
manual updmap wouldn't have produced
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:00:19 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have dlocate installed? If yes, please send us the output of
Not until now :-
dlocate updmap.log
(returns nothing)
dlocate updmap.cfg
tetex-base: /usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg
tetex-base:
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also useed find to seek for updmap.* files.
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/man/man1/updmap.1.gz
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
/usr/share/tetex-base/updmap.cfg
dlocate does not seem to care for usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:35:17 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dlocate does not seem to care for usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.
That one shouldn't be there. We've had this two times before in the
last couple of weeks, but unfortunately
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:16:30 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This shows that updmap is in fact executed, but it seems that it does
not do the right thing. However, it should save a detailed log of its
actions in /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log. Can you please make repeat
the
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if this helps debugging, but the fonts that where
initially missing from psfonts_t1.map are the ones from bsr.map,
bsr-interpolated.map, omega.map, xypic.map and eurosym.map. This are the
map files (and fonts) provided by tetex-extra. I
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:14:15 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a good observation. Arne, can you please try to execute (as
root)
sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst extra-postinst.lg 21
and send us the resulting file extra-postinst.lg.
Here it is. As
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:14:15 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a good observation. Arne, can you please try to execute (as
root)
sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst extra-postinst.lg 21
and send us the resulting file
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:50:05 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-extra.postinst configure extra-postinst.lg
21
Voila. This dutifully runs updmap which in turn touches
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map,
but does not change it from the status
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
and/or of the updmap log file - either as
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/updm*? If you have some of
these, please send them - but only the old
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 23:13 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
and/or of the updmap log file - either as
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/updm*? If
Arne Ahrend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: normal
After a fresh install (AMD64) dvips -Pwww or -Poutline would not use
the .pfb fonts. However, -Pcmz would. I believe this is due to
missing entries in /var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map.
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: normal
After a fresh install (AMD64) dvips -Pwww or -Poutline would not use the .pfb
fonts. However, -Pcmz would.
I believe this is due to missing entries in
/var/lib/texmf/dvips/config/psfonts_t1.map. Running updmap manually
once resolves the
30 matches
Mail list logo
