Bug#329301: acknowledged by developer (Bug#329301: fixed in libpam-ccreds 1-4)

2005-09-27 Thread Guido Guenther
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:53:40AM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: I'm not sure I understand the point of it, then. Why would you want to remove it if it matches? Wouldn't you want to remove it if it doesn't match? For instance, authentication failed because of an incorrect password, but all the

Bug#329301: acknowledged by developer (Bug#329301: fixed in libpam-ccreds 1-4)

2005-09-24 Thread Jerry Haltom
I'm not sure I understand the point of it, then. Why would you want to remove it if it matches? Wouldn't you want to remove it if it doesn't match? For instance, authentication failed because of an incorrect password, but all the services were available. On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 11:13 +0200, Guido

Bug#329301: acknowledged by developer (Bug#329301: fixed in libpam-ccreds 1-4)

2005-09-23 Thread Guido Guenther
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:47:13PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: It seems that action=update still does not remove the password from the cache. The cc_test utility with a - password does work, however. action=update only removes the password from the cache if it matches the one in the cache.

Bug#329301: acknowledged by developer (Bug#329301: fixed in libpam-ccreds 1-4)

2005-09-22 Thread Jerry Haltom
It seems that action=update still does not remove the password from the cache. The cc_test utility with a - password does work, however. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]