user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags #329701 close-20060531
thanks
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:43:04AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
adduser maintainership would like to see this discussed on
debian-devel. Please state your case there, and I'll decide what to do
afterwards.
Since the original submitter
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:46:55AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:40:31AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:08:50AM +0100, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
One additional possibility is for adduser to support an interface to
add users/groups in this new range,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:43:04AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:46:55AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
adduser maintainership would like to see this discussed on
debian-devel. Please state your case there, and I'll decide what to do
afterwards.
I personally don't care too
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:40:31AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:08:50AM +0100, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
One additional possibility is for adduser to support an interface to
add users/groups in this new range, which would involve a new
configuration option and at least
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which change is suggested to adduser?
The change of LAST_SYSTEM_UID in /etc/adduser.conf from 999 to 499.
/etc/adduser.conf is a conffile. The range 100-999 is laid down in
policy 9.2.2, so changing the default in adduser is out of the
question.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:08:50AM +0100, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not having a clue about NIS and never having had any sizeable amount
of local users, I'd like to have an executive summary for this bug
report.
Which change is suggested to adduser?
6 matches
Mail list logo
