Bug#329759: unfixed

2005-10-17 Thread Loic Minier
tags 329759 + pending thanks On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote: > I want the package to install and purge without errors. It seems that the > NMU doesn't have gconf2 as a depends, still. I still didn't check the NMU diff, but I uploaded a fixed package using misc:depends instead of a gco

Bug#329759: unfixed

2005-10-17 Thread Ryan Murray
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:28:52PM +0200, Loic Minier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote: > > Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to > > not fail if gconf2 is unavailable. > > Can you -vv your remark? You want the dh_gconf to be more robust? S

Bug#329759: unfixed

2005-10-17 Thread Loic Minier
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote: > Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to > not fail if gconf2 is unavailable. Can you -vv your remark? You want the dh_gconf to be more robust? Policy seems to grant explicitely this usage: The Depends field sh

Bug#329759: unfixed

2005-10-17 Thread Ryan Murray
reopen 329759 thanks Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to not fail if gconf2 is unavailable. signature.asc Description: Digital signature