Bug#329843: Check nano seconds (nsec) to accurate; extract of sym-links fails

2006-09-19 Thread Paul Eggert
Raphael Bossek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- tar-1.15.91.orig/src/extract.c +++ tar-1.15.91/src/extract.c @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ for (; ds; ds = ds-next) if (ds-dev == st1.st_dev ds-ino == st1.st_ino - timespec_cmp (ds-mtime,

Bug#329843: Check nano seconds (nsec) to accurate; extract of sym-links fails

2006-09-19 Thread Raphael Bossek
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: Raphael Bossek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- tar-1.15.91.orig/src/extract.c +++ tar-1.15.91/src/extract.c @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ for (; ds; ds = ds-next) if (ds-dev == st1.st_dev

Bug#329843: Check nano seconds (nsec) to accurate; extract of sym-links fails

2006-07-21 Thread Raphael Bossek
Hi tar folks, I've started a detailed analysis of the problem I complained. (By the way, the last patch is too radical and does not work/test suite fails too). Within my environment using UserModeLinux (http://user-mode-linux.sf.net) restore of nano secondes does not work! lstat() returns

Bug#329843: Check nano seconds (nsec) to accurate; extract of sym-links fails

2006-07-20 Thread Raphael Bossek
Dear tar people, I felt today into trouble after an upgrade to 1.15.91 version of tar on my Debian GNU/Linux machine. I'm running a little bit complecate environment (Debian- UserModeLinux- loopback mounted file as ext3) where extractions of a tar archive with sym-links fails (only 0 byte