Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-27 Thread Frank Küster
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: clone 330078 -1 reassign -1 dpkg retitle -1 dpkg: should offer to delete conffiles which do not exist in upgraded package thanks [...] Cloning this as a bug against dpkg: this is clearly beyond the domain of the tetex packages themselves. I think

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 25.09.05 Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, In order to update my pacage scalable-cyrfonts-tex for teTeX 3 I installed the version from experimental. However tetex-extra is missing there so later I downgraded my packages to the version from etch and sid. When I tried to use

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:13:03PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: What does grep latex /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and grep latex /etc/texmf/texmf.d tell you? $ grep latex /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf % LaTeX 2e specific macros are stored in latex/, macros that can only be % used with 2.09 in latex209/. In

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Frank Küster
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-31 Severity: important In order to update my pacage scalable-cyrfonts-tex for teTeX 3 I installed the version from experimental. However tetex-extra is missing there What do you mean with that? Surely it's on the

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 26.09.05 Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:13:03PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, What does grep latex /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and grep latex /etc/texmf/texmf.d tell you? $ grep latex /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf Sorry, my fault. I was thinking about

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:52:13PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Give us kpsewhich fmtutil.cnf, grep latex `kpsewhich fmtutil.cnf` and grep latex /etc/texmf/fmt.d/*. kpsewhich fmtutil.cnf outputs nothing. The output of grep latex /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf: # Standard formats (plain,

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:56:48PM +0200, Frank Kьster wrote: In order to update my pacage scalable-cyrfonts-tex for teTeX 3 I installed the version from experimental. However tetex-extra is missing there What do you mean with that? Surely it's on the servers. I guess I have

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 26.09.05 Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, # Standard formats (plain, latex) with all engines: latex pdfetex language.dat-translate-file=cp227.tcx *latex.ini pdflatex pdfetex language.dat-translate-file=cp227.tcx *pdflatex.ini These

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:40:08PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: These seem to be some residuals from your teTeX 3.0 installation, which were not removed for any reason. Fix for now should be: remove /etc/texmf/fmt.d/00tetex.cnf, call update-fmtutil and fmtutil --all . I guess you mean

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Frank Küster
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you think that this bug is due to misbehaviour of dpkg? True, 01tetex.cnf is a configuration file, but I hadn't edited it so it had to be removed during the downgrading. No, dpkg won't remove unused configuration files upon upgrading, and it won't

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:38PM +0200, Frank Kьster wrote: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you think that this bug is due to misbehaviour of dpkg? True, 01tetex.cnf is a configuration file, but I hadn't edited it so it had to be removed during the downgrading. No, dpkg

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Frank Küster
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:38PM +0200, Frank K.ster wrote: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you think that this bug is due to misbehaviour of dpkg? True, 01tetex.cnf is a configuration file, but I hadn't edited it so it had to be

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:13:40PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: No, it isn't. Everything is designed from the point of view of an upgrade, and in this case preserving local changes of course must include *not* to remove an unused conffile. It might contain important work of the local

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-26 Thread Julian Gilbey
clone 330078 -1 reassign -1 dpkg retitle -1 dpkg: should offer to delete conffiles which do not exist in upgraded package thanks On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:34:56PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: Thanks for the explanation but I had in mind only unchanged conffiles (unchanged by the local

Bug#330078: latex points to etex, not to tex

2005-09-25 Thread Anton Zinoviev
Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-31 Severity: important In order to update my pacage scalable-cyrfonts-tex for teTeX 3 I installed the version from experimental. However tetex-extra is missing there so later I downgraded my packages to the version from etch and sid. When I tried to use latex I