Bug#331688: autofs: Improper handling of configuration file

2005-10-04 Thread justinpryzby
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:51:12PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > severity 331688 minor > thanks Modifying conffiles (effectively what seems to have happened here) violates policy 10.7.4: The maintainer scripts must not alter a `conffile' of _any_ package, including the one the scr

Bug#331688: autofs: Improper handling of configuration file

2005-10-04 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
severity 331688 minor thanks On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 04:00:46PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Since I was upgrading from 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-10, that appears to be a > likely problem. There are solutions to this problem at dpkg.org. Somewhat odd I didn't see this myself, but OK, I'll look into it.

Bug#331688: autofs: Improper handling of configuration file

2005-10-04 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> autofs already uses ucf... > Did it just convert to ucf? If "just" is June, then yes. autofs (4.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low (...) * Use ucf for /etc/auto.{master,net,misc} and /etc/default/autofs. (Closes: #280109) (...

Bug#331688: autofs: Improper handling of configuration file

2005-10-04 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:40:13PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > While upgrading from version 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-10, I was prompted about > a configuration file change I did not make, which violates policy > 10.7.3. See dpkg.org for a way of migrating to ucf, if that's the > problem. The diff with

Bug#331688: autofs: Improper handling of configuration file

2005-10-04 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: autofs Version: 4.1.4-7 Severity: important File: /etc/auto.net While upgrading from version 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-10, I was prompted about a configuration file change I did not make, which violates policy 10.7.3. See dpkg.org for a way of migrating to ucf, if that's the problem. The diff wi