Hi Gerd, hello Dann !
I yesterday told you, to give a reply of your clues.
Yes, great , it works ! I did not know, that the module "bttv" now has the
opportunity to give additional parameters. Loading bttv with
additional parameters "type=10 pll=1 tuner=5" works great !
So, the bug was no bug an
Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 11:31 schrieb Gerd Knorr:
> >> What do I have to do ? I have to force the module to a special tuner,
> >> and the pll. Any clue ? Or did I understand something wrong ?
> >
> > I couldn't say. Gerd, do you have a pointer to some documentation that
> > might help Hans?
What do I have to do ? I have to force the module to a special tuner, and the
pll. Any clue ? Or did I understand something wrong ?
I couldn't say. Gerd, do you have a pointer to some documentation that
might help Hans?
Oh well. pll is a *bttv* insmod option, tuner.ko hasn't and never had
i
[Re-adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] & Gerd to the cc list;
please reply to all, not just to me personally]
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:56 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Hello Danny,
> thanks for the mail. But this would not solve my problem.
> What do I have to do ? I have to force the module to a special tuner,
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 17:38 +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > Gerd: do you know if the removal of this parameter was intentional?
>
> Yes. It's obsolete for years. It simply doesn't work that way with
> more than one tv card in the system. Boot 2.6.11 and watch the kernel
> messages ;)
Thanks Ge
> Gerd: do you know if the removal of this parameter was intentional?
Yes. It's obsolete for years. It simply doesn't work that way with
more than one tv card in the system. Boot 2.6.11 and watch the kernel
messages ;)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo modinfo tuner
$ /sbin/modinfo bttv | grep
(re-adding bug address to CC list - please include that on replies)
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 07:32 +0200, Hans wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2005 21:40 schrieben Sie:
> > On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 20:27 +0200, Hans wrote:
> > > The kernel module "tuner.o" will not accept additional options,
> > > jus
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 20:27 +0200, Hans wrote:
> The kernel module "tuner.o" will not accept additional options,
> just like -type=xx or pll=x. This was in earlier kernel-versions o.k.
What was the most recent kernel that worked?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6
Version: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kerne
9 matches
Mail list logo