On 28.10.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
It appears that the purging of tetex should at some point have at least
hinted at the existence of tex-common.
Why should it? I think most people would be rather annoyed by
that.
Am Donnerstag, den 27.10.2005, 17:07 +0200 schrieb Ralf Stubner:
Odd. /etc/texmf/language.d/00tex.cnf is part of tex-common, which is
installed on your system:
Yes, true. I have to add that the bug has disappeared now. Perhaps you
might want to tag it user-error but leave it open as a bad
Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that the purging of tetex should at some point have at least
hinted at the existence of tex-common.
Why should it? I think most people would be rather annoyed by that.
Moreover there might be also other packages that install files in
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: normal
Fresh install fails in postinst with:
update-language: cannot read /etc/texmf/language.d/00tex.cnf
However, there is a file called 00tetex.cnf
-- Package-specific info:
Please read and follow the instructions in the first lines below
the
Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: normal
Fresh install fails in postinst with:
update-language: cannot read /etc/texmf/language.d/00tex.cnf
However, there is a file called 00tetex.cnf
Strange. What are the permissions of that file? If
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 14:42 +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: normal
Fresh install fails in postinst with:
update-language: cannot read /etc/texmf/language.d/00tex.cnf
However, there is a file called 00tetex.cnf
Odd.
6 matches
Mail list logo
