On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:15:42PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > >> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
> > > > No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam
> > > > 0.79
> > > > package, which includes a patch fro
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
>
> > > No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79
> > > package, which includes a patch from the Debian selinux maintainers which
> > > does indeed open this (relatively mino
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:55:10PM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> On 27/02/2006 9:28 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> >> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
> > No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be pres
On 27/02/2006 6:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Julien Goodwin:
>
>> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
>> Ref:
>> http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977
>
> This page doesn't mention version 0.79 at all. Why do you think it's
> been fixed in our 0.79 vers
On 27/02/2006 9:28 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
>> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
>
> No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79
> package, which includes a patch from the
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79
package, which includes a patch from the Debian selinux maintainers which
does indeed open this
* Julien Goodwin:
> This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
> Ref:
> http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977
This page doesn't mention version 0.79 at all. Why do you think it's
been fixed in our 0.79 version?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
Ref:
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977
Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
8 matches
Mail list logo