tag 338603 patch
thanks
Hi,
please find attached a patch implementing what Petr suggested. I know
that I didn't use a patch/unpatch rule, but the "dirty" (patched)
sources will only be used during the build on kfreebsd-*, so that
shouldn't cause too much troubles. I just tried to KISS.
Please no
Hi,
thanks for your quick reply.
I must say, I am quite puzzled by the need to do this change. What
is so special on kfreebsd-*, that makes it necessary to name the
file-format differently ?
It is due to different kernel, with different ABI and different default for ld.
The intermediate .o f
Hi Petr,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:38:16PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Please support building of memtest86/memtest86+ also on kFreeBSD.
>
> The only necessary differences between Linux and kFreeBSD
> are in files memtest.lds and memtest_shared.lds.
>
> For building on kFreeBSD they have to c
Package: memtest86+
Please support building of memtest86/memtest86+ also on kFreeBSD.
The only necessary differences between Linux and kFreeBSD
are in files memtest.lds and memtest_shared.lds.
For building on kFreeBSD they have to contain
OUTPUT_FORMAT("elf32-i386-freebsd");
instead of
OUTPUT_F
4 matches
Mail list logo
