Hi,
To be more precise, removeal of initex could be a news but
its background, i.e. initex is replaced with tex -ini
is not a news. Anyway I'd like to know what statement
in NEWS.Debian do you think is appropriate?
I object to that assertion; it wasn't really announced anywhere.
I
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I have a better understanding on this problem at hand:
Debian tetex packages now use pdfetex. 'initex' interface does not
s/Debian tetex packages/teTeX/;
I wouldn't understand what 'initex' interface means if I hadn't
followed the discussion.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:07:48PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
all. In sarge, virtex was effectively a synonym for plain TeX.
Is this because fmt file for plain TeX is now called as
tex.fmt (but not plain.fmt which was common in old days),
and virtex is a symbolic link to tex, and a
Hi,
Well, it was a news, which could have been included in
3.0-2 NEWS.Debian.
To be more precise, removeal of initex could be a news but
its background, i.e. initex is replaced with tex -ini
is not a news. Anyway I'd like to know what statement
in NEWS.Debian do you think is
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:05:41PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Two questions remain:
1. Is there a documentation stating the differences of the tetex
implementation from the TeX as documented in TeXBook ?
That could be useful
Plain TeX (as executed by the command tex) on a default setup
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Well, it was a news, which could have been included in
3.0-2 NEWS.Debian.
To be more precise, removeal of initex could be a news but
its background, i.e. initex is replaced with tex -ini
is not a news. Anyway I'd like to know what statement
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:54:30PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
Wrong - the Debian package doesn't deprecate anything, and not even
teTeX does. Ten months too late, Debian has a package for teTeX 3.0
which drops a symlink and thus support for a prognam name which has been
deprecated for years.
From: Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#338608: Documenting change to tetex 3.0; deprecating initex and
virtex.
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:45:41 +
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:54:30PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
Wrong - the Debian package doesn't deprecate anything, and not even
From: Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#338608: Documenting change to tetex 3.0; deprecating initex
and virtex.
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:24:40 +
all. In sarge, virtex was effectively a synonym for plain TeX.
Is this because fmt file for plain TeX is now called as
tex.fmt
From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Documenting change to tetex 3.0; deprecating initex and virtex.
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:05:41 +0900
Debian tetex package deprecates initex and virtex commands since
version 3.0. initex has been superceded by -ini option of tex
command; invoke
10 matches
Mail list logo
