On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:24:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:14:58 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
of course uxterm is a script. When I've run valgrind recently, I see a
lot of problems in glibc (that definitely aren't caused by xterm). I'm
inclined to
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
Severity: normal
Running uxterm gives a warning:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x0804e900 ***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Everything works fine after the warning.
-Andrei
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:50:13PM +0100, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote:
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
Severity: normal
Running uxterm gives a warning:
of course uxterm is a script. When I've run valgrind recently, I see a
lot of problems in glibc (that definitely aren't caused by
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:14:58 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
of course uxterm is a script. When I've run valgrind recently, I see a
lot of problems in glibc (that definitely aren't caused by xterm). I'm
inclined to recommend that this be redirected to glibc.
(The dependencies don't list
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:24:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:14:58 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
of course uxterm is a script. When I've run valgrind recently, I see a
lot of problems in glibc (that definitely aren't caused by xterm). I'm
inclined to
5 matches
Mail list logo
