On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Luca Capello wrote:
Discard my previous questions, I found what you were referring to:
Hmm. Didn't see the previous mail, maybe it was lost in the migration
you mention below?
=
--- /usr/bin/caff.ORG 2005-11-20 18:37:06.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/caff
Hello Peter!
On Wed 23 Nov 2005 15:43 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Luca Capello wrote:
Discard my previous questions, I found what you were referring to:
Hmm. Didn't see the previous mail, maybe it was lost in the
migration you mention below?
No, actually my previous
Hello!
On Sat 19 Nov 2005 21:18 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
First of all, this is not of severity important. Please stop this
severity inflation.
Well, from the definition of severity important: a bug which has a
major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it
completely
Re: Luca Capello in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2) For each key I've in my signature [1], only the mail to my
University address (zoo.unige.ch) wasn't readable.
So I bet your university mail server breaks things. I doubt there
is anything caff can do about this.
It seems that you completely
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a reason why you want to exclude others from the discussion now?
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Luca Capello wrote:
[something, and fortunately also the real mails.]
Try to set the encoding to 7bit where we build the multipart/encrypted
mime part in send_mail().
If that
Hello!
On Sun 20 Nov 2005 12:47 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Luca Capello in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems that you completely ignored the rest of my report.
The rest of the report said the same.
Let me disagree explaining why I opened this bug:
1) I used caff to sign Martin's key.
2) I
Package: signing-party
Version: 0.4.4-2
Severity: important
Hello!
I met Martin F. Krafft (madduck) last week-end for a key-signing party
(well, we were only two :-( ).
Last Monday he and me signed our keys using caff and as I was at
university I used the university mailserver via postfix (I'm
7 matches
Mail list logo
