On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:40:25AM +0100, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:09:11PM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:42:59PM +0100, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:35:00PM -0600,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:31:14AM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
In that case, it's expected behavior (aside from it getting set to false,
of course). Aside from editing the file manually, all that I know of that
would do this is deactivating the automatically resolver dependencies of a
Could you send me (or rather post somewhere) the contents of /etc/apt,
/var/lib/apt, /var/lib/aptitude, and /var/lib/dpkg/status?
Thanks,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Oh, if it's not possible to supply the information I requested, would it
be possible for you to send the output when you run the same command with
the additional options -o aptitude::cmdline::resolver-debug=true and
-o aptitude::gc-debug=true?
Thanks,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:22:53PM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Could you send me (or rather post somewhere) the contents of /etc/apt,
/var/lib/apt, /var/lib/aptitude, and /var/lib/dpkg/status?
Sure. It's on http://q.bofh.de/~mh/stuff/340991-help.tar.gz
Greetings
Marc
--
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:57:58PM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Oh, if it's not possible to supply the information I requested, would it
be possible for you to send the output when you run the same command with
the additional options -o aptitude::cmdline::resolver-debug=true and
-o
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:35:00PM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On a second look at this bug report, I think I may have misunderstood
it the first time I skimmed over it. The bug is not that the solution
suggested is incorrect, but that the dependencies should be resolved
without prompting
On a second look at this bug report, I think I may have misunderstood
it the first time I skimmed over it. The bug is not that the solution
suggested is incorrect, but that the dependencies should be resolved
without prompting in this case, right?
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Could you also send me the file ~/.aptitude/config?
Thanks,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:42:59PM +0100, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:35:00PM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On a second look at this bug report, I think I may have misunderstood
it the first time I skimmed over it. The bug is not that the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:09:11PM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:42:59PM +0100, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:35:00PM -0600, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On a second look at this bug report, I think I may have misunderstood
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: important
All of a sudden, aptitude has started to complain about packages that
are broken. Looks like it is no longer trying hard enough to resolve
dependencies. This, for example, happens if one tries to install
build-essential, or reportbug. See
12 matches
Mail list logo
