Unless someone is going to make a concerted and dedicated development
effort to do the necessary full analysis and backport all of the
necessary changes, I would suggest to simply not enable TLS for the
sparc64 glibc build at this time so at least we have something which
works.
That works.
There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code
in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS
relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and
therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute.
Not even /lib64/libc.so.6
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:14:43PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Package: libc6-sparc64
Version: 2.3.5-8
Severity: normal
There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code
in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS
relcation support is in
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:41:55 -0500
Replacing Aurelien's patch with this one fixes the
/lib64/libc.so.6: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type
0x4f
problem, and /lib64/libc.so.6 --version works fine.
However, 64-bit binaries
Package: libc6-sparc64
Version: 2.3.5-8
Severity: normal
There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code
in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS
relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and
therefore so no binary linked against
5 matches
Mail list logo
