On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:15:55PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> So, it looks like there are more severe problems on sparc than the ones
> you've mentioned.
I know ghc6 is broken on sparc, but when it is also unbuildable
/everywhere/ I can't fix it.
If it's important to you to do a binary-only
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ian Lynagh wrote:
ghc6 has been unbuildable since November due to first xmltex being
broken[1], and then problems with make[2]. It looks like the make
problem won't be fixed for the next release, so will have to be worked
around in GHC; hopefully we'll have a workaround soon
Hi Jurij,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:49:32PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> There has been no improvement on ghc6 situation on sparc since December.
> At the moment about 20 packages FTBFS there due to the fact that ghc6 is
> unusable. It would be great if you could do something about it, or g
Hi Ian,
There has been no improvement on ghc6 situation on sparc since December.
At the moment about 20 packages FTBFS there due to the fact that ghc6 is
unusable. It would be great if you could do something about it, or give
some directions on what needs to be done to get ghc6 fixed. Please l
Hi all,
These look like symptoms of bitrot in ghc6's registerised sparc support.
I'll make it unregisterised for the next ghc6 upload, but this won't
happen until I can install ghc6's build-deps again (#338327 / #340076).
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
5 matches
Mail list logo
