On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:54:49PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:10:35AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
I already imagined suggesting this for sarge but it was then a bit late.
Tagging.
Andreas has consented (pkg-exim4-devel, 2005-05-01) to the change, and
he also
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags #342077 debconf-rework
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:10:35AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
I already imagined suggesting this for sarge but it was then a bit late.
Tagging.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 06:50, you wrote:
Preseeding *all* exim configuration would be a real complicated thing
given the various options offered to users. I would prefer only
documenting the delivery option, which is the only one asked for
default installs (the root mail user destination
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If the delivery option question is made prio high, there is no real need
to preseed it anymore with the default value, is there?
However, users may be interested in setting up the mailserver for other
configurations than local delivery through
Quoting Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:10:35AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
(CC'ing -boot as this is strongly installer-related given that exim4 is
installed on all systems by default)
I have tried for a week to get comments about this on #debian-boot,
but
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:23:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
The rationale is: there is a sane default anyway (Local delivery only)
so skipping the question during critical priority installs will not
hurt and will save one question in critical priority installs.
otoh, the vast majority
Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:23:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
The rationale is: there is a sane default anyway (Local delivery only)
so skipping the question during critical priority installs will not
hurt and will save one question in critical priority installs.
/me wonders why a new bug was opened on this when #260141 is also still
open...
On Monday 12 December 2005 18:23, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:10:35AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
(CC'ing -boot as this is strongly
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
/me wonders why a new bug was opened on this when #260141 is also still
open...
OLd brain is probably the reason..:). If both bugs are really the same
(sorry, can't check right nowno Wireless in my local buses), then
merging should be done.
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
/me wonders why a new bug was opened on this when #260141 is also still
open...
Well, #260141 was indeed a double suggestion:
-rewrite the debconf title
-change the priority
As the bug title talks about the debconf templates titles and not
about the
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:10:35AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
(CC'ing -boot as this is strongly installer-related given that exim4 is
installed on all systems by default)
I have tried for a week to get comments about this on #debian-boot,
but nobody seems to care. Why should I?
Greetings
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.52-2
Severity: wishlist
(CC'ing -boot as this is strongly installer-related given that exim4 is
installed on all systems by default)
I already imagined suggesting this for sarge but it was then a bit late.
The currentl dc_eximconfig_configtype question is asked
12 matches
Mail list logo
