Package: lsb Severity: wishlist lsb has a versioned build-depends on a dpkg-dev package version that is not in sarge. lsb seems, however, to build fine on sarge, and backported lsb-base works reasonably well on sarge in case of an lsb'ized init script.
Since we _will_ live with backports, and lsb'ized init scripts are becoming increasingly common, the apparently unnecessary requirement to backport _dpkg_ just to be able to backport a package with an lsb'ized init script is a pain. Please document _why_ the versioned build depends is really needed, and consider adapting the package to make it unnecessary. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.4-zgsrv Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
