Hi,
The sysfsutils maintainer has removed the .la file, and now
cpufrequtils has build succesfully. I think you can close this
bug now.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 08:37:05PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 08:15:56PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:38:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It's linking against the static libsysfs.a instead of against the
shared libsysfs.so.
can't it be
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 02:50:10PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
damn! :)
btw: pergolesi doesn't seem to have them, hence my guess.
I'm wondering if also other distributions have this issue building from
source on amd64.
On pergolesi you need the sid_amd64_pure chroot, the rest is i386.
I
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:38:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: important
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -shared .libs/cpufreq.o .libs/sysfs.o .libs/proc.o
-lsysfs
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 08:15:56PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:38:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
It's linking against the static libsysfs.a instead of against the
shared libsysfs.so.
can't it be an issue in /lib vs /lib64 instead? Maybe libtool is trying
to
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: important
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -shared .libs/cpufreq.o .libs/sysfs.o .libs/proc.o
-lsysfs -Wl,-soname -Wl,libcpufreq.so.0 -o .libs/libcpufreq.so.0.0.0
/usr/bin/ld:
6 matches
Mail list logo
