tags 345604 etch-ignore
thanks
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:51:51AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
I've written earlier in this bug:
,
| Since we should really check other docs as well, I'm retitling this one,
| and we'll keep it open until every document has been checked.
`
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, first of all, according to your last email we still have the following
two issues:
[...]
These were designated ignorable for etch, but that doesn't mean they
aren't problems, and nothing in your mail suggested that they are resolved.
Yes, sorry, I
tags 345604 -etch-ignore
thanks
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, first of all, according to your last email we still have the following
two issues:
[...]
These were designated ignorable for etch, but that doesn't
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, I didn't understand that these fixes had yet to reach testing.
They're fixed in the binary package since long, but the orig.tar.gz
still has the non-free files.
Cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The consequences of these guidelines for the tex licensing bugs seem to be
as follows:
345604:
ConTeXt upstream says they aren't interested in relicensing; RC bug.
This is already solved, ConTeXt documentation is in tetex-doc-nonfree
csname.txt:
5 matches
Mail list logo
