Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
It seems that it's still failing to build because of java problems. I get errors such as: HelpContent.java: In class 'com.sun.star.help.HelpContent': HelpContent.java: In constructor '(com.sun.star.help.HelpProvider,com.sun.star.help.HelpContentIdentifier)': HelpContent.java:25: error: final

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-11 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
On 1/11/06, Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sincerely, it's not as bad as you said. I did a tour of it yesterday and my desktop didn't burst into fire. :) I found few problems but nothing really lethal until now (I admit I didn't try very deep but I was expecting much worst). Did you

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-11 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Martin Kretzschmar wrote: Did you try e.g. load/save? Erk ! :) It seems that I can't open a file saved with a 32bits version. Hm. I told you I didn't try very hard. :) And I can say, that it brought my X server to its knees at least once by allocating several gigabytes of pixmaps.

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: touch debian/stampdir/maintscripts /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS=-Npython-uno -Nopenoffice.org-gcj -Nopenoffice.org-hunspell -Nopenoffice.org-filter-so52 -s binary-common make[1]: Entering directory

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: Well, I suggest to add the following to debian/rules (or similar): --- debian/rules2006-01-10 12:02:31.0 +0100 +++ debian/rules-amd64 2006-01-10 18:49:09.0 +0100 @@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ BUILD_AMD64=y endif +ifeq $(DIST) Debian +

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Rene Engelhard wrote: This is what the bug I referenced in my last mail wants. And I don't want to do that (in any case, why not just an else?). It still is too premature for that afaik. And no, before you ask; Ubuntu doesn't ship it either, they just build it and let the build fail... You

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-04 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi all, Martin Kretzschmar wrote: I've updated the patch that disables optimization of that file: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/ooo-build/patches/src680/svx-customshapes-NOOPTFILES.diff?view=markup Emmanuel, change your *svx/source/customshapes/makefile.mk in the same way, and it should

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep:

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-04 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
On 1/4/06, Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It worked really fine. I've never been so far in the building process ! Here is the next problem I got a missing file (debian/scripts/vars.amd64): If you take a closer look, you will see that there's no such file for any other arch. I guess

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-03 Thread Martin Kretzschmar
Rene Engelhard wrote: openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/build/ooa680-m1/svx/source/customshapes/EnhancedCustomShapeFunctionParser.cxx Ah. That again. See the makefile.mk. There are already workarounds there for various other archs/platforms... I've updated the patch that disables

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-02 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source Fixing rhino and other problems. Please apply. diff -ruNbB openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply ---

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
severity 345611 wishlist thanks Hi, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source This is not important IMHO. It may build but not work, so.. Fixing rhino and other problems. Please apply. diff -ruNbB

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-02 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Rene Engelhard wrote: This is not important IMHO. It may build but not work, so.. Agree. I did just select the can't compile option in reportbug, it selected the important level itself. I should have changed it to minor. WTF are you reporting a new bug for this when we had that rhino

Bug#345611: openoffice.org: [64bit] Making OpenOffice src compile

2006-01-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: This small patch has several good points, it fixes several problems and yet minimize its footprints, it also makes it a step closer to the inclusion of Debian64 in official. What part of OOo2 native on amd64 is not yet usable did you not understand?