Am 2006-04-12 14:16:35, schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
Hi,
A version of kernel-package is now being uploaded with a fix
to this issue.
Thank you!
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux
Hi,
A version of kernel-package is now being uploaded with a fix
to this issue.
manoj
--
When I woke up this morning, my girlfriend asked if I had slept
well. I said, No, I made a few mistakes. -- Steven Wright
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Xen 3.0.2 was released yeaterday and the new kernel patch shipped doesn't
provide the xen arch any longer, making xen a subarchitecture of x86 as Tore has
explained.
The bad news is that now make-kpkg fails when trying to build a xen kernel...
Here is the build log, it seems that
* Tore Anderson
I think that file is only used if ARCH=xen. Which is correct for
all released versions of Xen, but the new implementation that
eventually will be merged into the kernel sources use ARCH=i386 (or
x86_64), and then you choose Xen-compatible when asked for
Subarchitecture Type
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:37:11 +0100, Tore Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava
I see code in /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/arches/xen.mk to
call and use vmlinuz insted of bzImage for kernel versions later
than 2.5.41 -- is the version check not good enough?
I think that
Hi,
I see code in /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/arches/xen.mk
to call and use vmlinuz insted of bzImage for kernel versions later
than 2.5.41 -- is the version check not good enough?
manoj
--
Mirrors should reflect a little before throwing back images. Jean
Cocteau
Manoj
* Manoj Srivastava
I see code in /usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/arches/xen.mk
to call and use vmlinuz insted of bzImage for kernel versions later
than 2.5.41 -- is the version check not good enough?
I think that file is only used if ARCH=xen. Which is correct for all
released
Hi,
I would be happy to add support, but I do not use Xen, and I
can't test it. If you could tell me how you build Xen images manually
(without kernel-package, just with the KConfig build system), and any
suggestions on how one could distinguish between a normal i386 build
and
* Manoj Srivastava
I would be happy to add support, but I do not use Xen, and I
can't test it. If you could tell me how you build Xen images manually
(without kernel-package, just with the KConfig build system), and any
suggestions on how one could distinguish between a normal i386
Package: kernel-package
Severity: wishlist
Hi. It seems make-kpkg fails at building a kernel image with Xen as
an x86 subarch, because it expects a bzImage, whereas Xen can only
start plain vmlinuz images (the Xen hypervisor itself is the only thing
that needs an x86 boot sector).
It
10 matches
Mail list logo