Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Are we going to remove all HP PPDs from all other PPD-installing packages
in Debian, including the crap that comes with cupsys by default, and the
ones in foomatic* ?
Currently both foomatic-filters-ppds and hplip provide exactly the same
PPDs for hpijs
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Pascal De Vuyst wrote:
For the above reasons hplip-ppd should provide HPLIP PPDs and
foomatic-filters-ppds should not.
HPLIP provides *HP* PPDs. This includes all hpijs ones, and all postscript
ones. I am not about to deal with the mess of shipping a different set of
PPDs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006, Pascal De Vuyst wrote:
hplip-ppds package incorrectly uses *Manufacturer: HP (HPLIP) inside PPDs.
Yes, this is done on purpose because of the myriad of other sources of
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
An alternate approach, used by Foomatic and Gutenprint, is to put the
driver name after the model:
zgrep '^\*NickName:'
/usr/share/cups/model/gutenprint/5.0/en/stp-escp2-c60.5.0.ppd.gz
*NickName: EPSON Stylus C60 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.0.0-rc2
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Roger Leigh wrote:
An alternate approach, used by Foomatic and Gutenprint, is to put the
driver name after the model:
zgrep '^\*NickName:'
Package: hplip-ppds
Version: 0.9.7-4
hplip-ppds package incorrectly uses *Manufacturer: HP (HPLIP) inside PPDs.
According to the Adobe PPD Specification v4.3 the correct *Manufacturer string should be
HP (case sensitive).
The Adobe PPD Specification is located at
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006, Pascal De Vuyst wrote:
hplip-ppds package incorrectly uses *Manufacturer: HP (HPLIP) inside PPDs.
Yes, this is done on purpose because of the myriad of other sources of
possibly non-compatible PPDs for HP printers managed by hpijs (i.e. HPLIP).
Are we going to remove all HP
7 matches
Mail list logo
