FYI, r67-2 is negative also for me. So far I have not had any success in
nailing it down from the 2.0->2.4 upgrade diffs. One suspect was (... ||
1) in a if condition related to AP selection but it didn't solve the
problem.
I forgot to mention earlier: the funniest side-effect this bug has is a
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 20:27 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > * I do indeed get the "No AP for 5 seconds" stuff.
> > * When the broken driver is loaded, "iwconfig" claims that wlan0 (the
> > zd1211 interface) does not have wireless
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 20:27 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> * I do indeed get the "No AP for 5 seconds" stuff.
> * When the broken driver is loaded, "iwconfig" claims that wlan0 (the
> zd1211 interface) does not have wireless extensions.
That's known and has been reintroduced on purpose because
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:36:12PM +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> Could you try the zd1211_0.0.0.svnr67-2 I uploaded a minute ago and see
> if the bug is still there?
Yes, it's still there.
Some more information:
* I do indeed get the "No AP for 5 seconds" stuff.
* When the broke
Hi Wouter,
Could you try the zd1211_0.0.0.svnr67-2 I uploaded a minute ago and see
if the bug is still there?
Robert.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> I created a patch for myself which removes 2.4.0.0 driver WPA related
> stuff, and also tried the for-loop fix from 2.5.0.0. Basically its
> downgrade to r52 with 2.5.0.0 bugfix.
Should, of course, say: ...which removes 2.4.0.0 driver and WPA related
Hello,
I had a bit similar issue. I'm not sure whether it's caused by the same
bug or not.
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 18:53:45 +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 10:57 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Building zd1211-source again
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:36:22PM +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 16:15 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Perhaps it's an endianness issue then? (ppc here)
>
> I'm testing it with ppc as well. What USB stick is that?
Sorry for the information overflow:
Bus 004 Device 003: I
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 16:15 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Perhaps it's an endianness issue then? (ppc here)
I'm testing it with ppc as well. What USB stick is that?
> Didn't try that. When I get home tonight, I will.
Thanks.
Robert.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 18:53:45 +0100, Robert Jordens wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 10:57 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Building zd1211-source against vanilla 2.6.15.6 works, but the resulting
> > driver does not seem to work; it loads, it associates, but I don't get a
> > DHCP reply that wor
severity 356190 important
thanks
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 10:57 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Building zd1211-source against vanilla 2.6.15.6 works, but the resulting
> driver does not seem to work; it loads, it associates, but I don't get a
> DHCP reply that works.
>
> Downgrading to the version
Package: zd1211-source
Version: 0.0.0.svnr59-1
Severity: grave
Justification: makes package in question unusable
Hi,
Building zd1211-source against vanilla 2.6.15.6 works, but the resulting
driver does not seem to work; it loads, it associates, but I don't get a
DHCP reply that works.
Downgradin
12 matches
Mail list logo
