* Martin Schulze:
Imho, it's more useful to upload 2.1.5-8sarge4 and only bump the
version number to get the new version built for all architectures into
the archive.
While you are at it, you could also include this patch:
Revision: 8001
Hi,
let a be an architecture in sarge. Then one of the following holds for
mailman in sarge r3:
- it is affected by a security problem.
- it has a severity critical bug.
Mailman in sid:
- may or may not suffer of a security problem
A security problem in Mailman in sarge patched in May has
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
let a be an architecture in sarge. Then one of the following holds for
mailman in sarge r3:
- it is affected by a security problem.
- it has a severity critical bug.
Mailman in sid:
- may or may not suffer of a security problem
A security problem in
Hi *,
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stable release team, please react accordingly; you may for example do
a binary sourceless NMU for the architectures that have -8sarge3 the
security update so that they all have -8sarge3 the maintainer update.
Imho, it's more useful to upload
4 matches
Mail list logo
