Hello listmasters,
I believe that we have settled all the issues regarding the request for
creation of debian-kernel-devel. In spite of that, no comments from
listmasters have been received since April 17th, and no visible action has
been taken. Is there still some kind of showstopper?
Best
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
A good point, still i worry, debian-kernel doesn't sound like a bug mailing
list, so newcomers may be surprised.
It is not intended as a bug-only mailing list. d-k will still remain a
primary point of contact for the kernel team for users. And discussio
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:52:27PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > debian-kernel-bugs ?
> >
> > If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is
> > by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy
> > be
> > confusing.
>
> The point is to *
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
> >
> > > > >what about that?
> > > > >
> > > > >debian-devel-kernel@
> >
> > > > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the
> > > > day
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Cord Beerman wrote:
> >
> > >what about that?
> > >
> > >debian-devel-kernel@
> > >
> > >Cord
> >
> > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
> > it is not that important. If you ha
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote:
> Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
>
> > > >what about that?
> > > >
> > > >debian-devel-kernel@
>
> > > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
> > > it is not that important. If you have
Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
> > >what about that?
> > >
> > >debian-devel-kernel@
> > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
> > it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
> > debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahe
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cord Beerman wrote:
>
> >what about that?
> >
> >debian-devel-kernel@
> >
> >Cord
>
> I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
> it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
> debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-de
Hi,
Cord Beerman wrote:
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are
drowning in bug t
what about that?
debian-devel-kernel@
Cord
--
BOFH excuse #121:
halon system went off and killed the operators.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
