Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-20 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Marcus Better 2007-01-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This broke again. Please compare http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The first shows 88 packages, the second only one. Perhaps the fix to #370454 broke it? Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case

Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-12 Thread Marcus Better
reopen 359044 thanks This broke again. Please compare http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The first shows 88 packages, the second only one. Perhaps the fix to #370454 broke it? Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive? Marcus

Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:13 +0100, Marcus Better wrote: [...] Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive? Since you asked ;-) - no, at least for local parts (i.e. the portion preceding the @). In fact, they MUST NOT (in the BCP14 meaning of that phrase) be. From RFC2821: Verbs and

Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2006-03-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: qa.debian.org Version n/a; 2006-03-26 The summary page for Wolfgang Baer, URL:http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED], only show one package at the moment. It shows tomcat4, while he is an uploader or maintainer of a lot more packages, for example the source packages buoy and