Re: Marcus Better 2007-01-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This broke again. Please compare
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The first shows 88 packages, the second only one.
Perhaps the fix to #370454 broke it? Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case
reopen 359044
thanks
This broke again. Please compare
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The first shows 88 packages, the second only one.
Perhaps the fix to #370454 broke it? Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case
insensitive?
Marcus
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:13 +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
[...]
Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive?
Since you asked ;-) - no, at least for local parts (i.e. the portion
preceding the @). In fact, they MUST NOT (in the BCP14 meaning of that
phrase) be. From RFC2821:
Verbs and
Package: qa.debian.org
Version n/a; 2006-03-26
The summary page for Wolfgang Baer,
URL:http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED], only show
one package at the moment. It shows tomcat4, while he is an uploader
or maintainer of a lot more packages, for example the source packages
buoy and
4 matches
Mail list logo