Bug#360740: [m68k] xfsprogs builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-05 Thread Nathan Scott
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:55:52AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > If you're about to do an upload (say next couple of weeks), then just Upload of xfsprogs 2.7.16 has now been done.. cheers. -- Nathan pgpvdNZOXAw1I.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#360740: [m68k] xfsprogs builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-05 Thread Nathan Scott
Hi Stephen, On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:55:52AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > If you're about to do an upload (say next couple of weeks), then just > let me know when you do so I can grab the buildd. If you're not > planning on doing it anytime soon, then I'll build it when I have free OK -

Bug#360740: [m68k] xfsprogs builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:42:19PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:18:49PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:23:29AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > ... > > I'd simply compile the package with gcc-4.1. If you're not planning a > > sourceful upload

Bug#360740: [m68k] xfsprogs builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Nathan Scott
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:18:49PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:23:29AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > ... > I'd simply compile the package with gcc-4.1. If you're not planning a > sourceful upload any time soon, this would get the package up-to-date > and I'd have one

Bug#360740: [m68k] xfsprogs builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:23:29AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > This looks like a clear gcc bug - why is it assigned to xfsprogs? > (I guess I need to know how do you expect this to become fixed by > any change in xfsprogs?). > > Do you want a platform-specific dependency on gcc-4.1 or later (is

Bug#360740: [m68k] xfsprogs builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Nathan Scott
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:56:56AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Package: xfsprogs > Version: 2.7.14-1 > Severity: important > > The ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage (333536) which persists > on m68k in gcc-4.0 is fixed in gcc-4.1. This looks like a clear gcc bug - why is it assigned t

Bug#360740: [m68k] xfsprogs builds with gcc-4.1

2006-04-04 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Package: xfsprogs Version: 2.7.14-1 Severity: important The ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage (333536) which persists on m68k in gcc-4.0 is fixed in gcc-4.1. I'm willing to do a binNMU if that would be helpful.