Bug#361954: status update?

2011-03-22 Thread Jose Antonio Quevedo
Hi folks, this package have been stuck while we were waitting for the OpenSSL exception to be added to the Ossec's legal code. Today this exception haven't been added, but Daniel Cid (upstream) wants to keep his code as GPL, so we can continue working hoping to solve the OpenSSL issue later.

Bug#361954: status update?

2011-03-01 Thread Ciarán Handley
Jose, Are you having discussions about this with the developer outside of their mailing lists? From what I found on the different lists at http://www.ossec.net/main/support/ there haven't been any updates since '09. It seems to me that for them to add exception/s is a trivial change. Why is

Bug#361954: Status update

2010-09-24 Thread Jose Antonio Quevedo Muñoz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, about the last status update report: - - secondary functionality was already included in last upstream code, - - security concerns were overriden, - - the license exception for OpenSSL haven't been included by upstream yet. The

Bug#361954: Status update

2010-09-22 Thread Vincent Blut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Any news about the first 2 improvement ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyaRPMACgkQfwer1QPZVNIhjQCfXMxJofk98XZUhp38XlicltxL

Bug#361954: Status update

2010-05-30 Thread Jose Antonio Quevedo Muñoz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all again, an improvements list about ossec v2.3 was uploaded to upstream on April 13th, 2010. This improvements are about license issues, how this software works (security issues), and secondary functionality. Now we are waiting for the first

Bug#361954: Status update

2010-01-26 Thread Jose Antonio Quevedo Muñoz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, first of all, I'd like to thank Matej Vela for his last notes in this thread, it was a very good place to start analyzing the package. Today Ossec cannot be distributed by Debian because of a license issue that was notified to the upstream