Hi Kurt,
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:52:18AM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
The idea was to only compile the -dbg package with valgrind support, so
that the normal library would not be changed. If someone would like to
use valgrind to check his program he would just use
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:25:36AM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:52:18AM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
The idea was to only compile the -dbg package with valgrind support, so
that the normal library would not be changed. If
Hi Kurt,
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
The -dbg package is just stripped out debug symbols moved to a
different file/package. Installing the debug package doesn't
change the normal library, it's just that the debugger can know
found the debug symbols. The library just has a special header
saying
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:52:18AM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
The -dbg package is just stripped out debug symbols moved to a
different file/package. Installing the debug package doesn't
change the normal library, it's just that the debugger can know
Hi Kurt,
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
What it's doing is adding uninitialised numbers to the pool to
create random numbers.
I've been thinking about commenting those out.
I've been told that using VALGRIND_MAKE_READABLE can be used to
suppress those errors. So I've been pondering about
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:12:50PM +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
What it's doing is adding uninitialised numbers to the pool to
create random numbers.
I've been thinking about commenting those out.
I've been told that using VALGRIND_MAKE_READABLE
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:01:22PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.7e
Severity: wishlist
Suppressions don't seem to be good enough to eliminate this
unfortunately - the uninitializedness taints all the users of the
openssl random number generator, producing
7 matches
Mail list logo
