* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:41:22PM -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:04:12PM -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not seeing what us being different
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:41:22PM -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:04:12PM -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not seeing what us being different is buying us though. Sure, the
mozilla format
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:04:12PM -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not seeing what us being different is buying us though. Sure, the
mozilla format is stupid, but there doesn't seem to be any advantage
to the way you've done it. It's ok for us to be different, but there
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:10:03PM -0600, Benj Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I ran across this bug while trying to resolve a problem I'm having with
FCKeditor[1]. FCKeditor compares the javascript value
navigator.productSub[2] to a number (20030210) in its browser detection
Hello,
I ran across this bug while trying to resolve a problem I'm having with
FCKeditor[1]. FCKeditor compares the javascript value
navigator.productSub[2] to a number (20030210) in its browser detection
code. This now fails because navigator.productSub
is 'Debian-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-2'.
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:04:12PM -0400, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not seeing what us being different is buying us though. Sure, the
mozilla format is stupid, but there doesn't seem to be any advantage
to the way you've done it.
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-3
Severity: minor
The user-agent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); rv:1.8.0.2)
Gecko/Debian-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-3 Firefox/1.5.0.2
violates Mozilla user-agent string specification
On 24/04/06, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:42:30PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The user-agent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); rv:1.8.0.2)
Gecko/Debian-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-3 Firefox/1.5.0.2
violates Mozilla
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:00:50PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 24/04/06, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:42:30PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
The user-agent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:06:26PM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:42:30PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-3
Severity: minor
The user-agent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:46:36PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 24/04/06, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:00:50PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't this cause problems for scripts that attempt to parse user-agent
On 24/04/06, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:00:50PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Won't this cause problems for scripts that attempt to parse user-agent
string?
Why would it ?
They could naively expect the string to follow the
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:06:26PM +0200, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:42:30PM +0200, Piotr Engelking [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-3
Severity: minor
The
13 matches
Mail list logo
