Bug#365349: linux-image-*-dbg for squeeze?

2010-05-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/04/10 at 21:01 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >> > I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to > >> > sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could use to build the > >> > kernels and upload from, replacing kernel-archive.buildserver.net ? > >> The easiest f

Bug#365349: linux-image-*-dbg for squeeze?

2010-04-26 Thread Joerg Jaspert
>> > I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to >> > sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could use to build the >> > kernels and upload from, replacing kernel-archive.buildserver.net ? >> The easiest fix is the official blessing by the ftp team to upload onl

Bug#365349: linux-image-*-dbg for squeeze?

2010-03-06 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
[ Adding ftpmasters to To: ] On 05/03/10 at 19:34 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to > > sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could use to build the > >

Bug#365349: linux-image-*-dbg for squeeze?

2010-03-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to > sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could use to build the > kernels and upload from, replacing kernel-archive.buildserver.net ? The easiest fix i

Bug#365349: linux-image-*-dbg for squeeze?

2010-03-05 Thread John Wright
Hi Lucas, On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 04/03/10 at 16:40 -0700, John Wright wrote: > > Hi kernel team, > > > > (Cc-ing -devel to get more eyes on the subject, since I'm soliciting > > ideas here... See [1] for some context.) > > > > What would it take to

Bug#365349: linux-image-*-dbg for squeeze?

2010-03-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/03/10 at 16:40 -0700, John Wright wrote: > Hi kernel team, > > (Cc-ing -devel to get more eyes on the subject, since I'm soliciting > ideas here... See [1] for some context.) > > What would it take to get kernel debuginfo into squeeze? As I > understand it, the main blockers were [2]: Hi

Bug#365349: linux-image-*-dbg for squeeze?

2010-03-04 Thread John Wright
Hi kernel team, (Cc-ing -devel to get more eyes on the subject, since I'm soliciting ideas here... See [1] for some context.) What would it take to get kernel debuginfo into squeeze? As I understand it, the main blockers were [2]: 1) It would blow up the archive by ~10 GB - This is a lot