On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:10:46AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 06:22:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 20.09.2009 13:43, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > >Package: java-common
> > >Version: 0.33
> > >Severity: normal
> > >
> > >I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk}
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 06:22:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 20.09.2009 13:43, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >Package: java-common
> >Version: 0.33
> >Severity: normal
> >
> >I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk} for free and
> >java-{jre,jdk}-nonfree
> >for nonfree packages.
>
> No, w
On 20.09.2009 13:43, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: java-common
Version: 0.33
Severity: normal
I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk} for free and
java-{jre,jdk}-nonfree
for nonfree packages.
No, we should develop against a spec, not against a product. maybe this was more
wanted in t
Package: java-common
Version: 0.33
Severity: normal
I second this proposal using the java-{jre,jdk} for free and
java-{jre,jdk}-nonfree
for nonfree packages.
~Niels
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500,
4 matches
Mail list logo