Bug#368228: About your wish for ifupdown changes...

2007-12-30 Thread Claus Fischer
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 10:42:35PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: : The only problem with the second one is that those kind of routes will : get lost when when the interface they are associated with is downed and : will not come back up again when you run '/etc/init.d/networking

Bug#368228: About your wish for ifupdown changes...

2007-12-30 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 07:13:47PM +0100, Claus Fischer wrote: Thanks for the nice package. I'd say it goes a long way but isn't fully there yet (for my particular needs). (...) Work needed: - reject routes those are not interface bound but sometimes necessary: 10.0.0.0

Bug#368228: About your wish for ifupdown changes...

2007-12-29 Thread Claus Fischer
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 07:18:30PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: : On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:59:59PM +0100, Claus Fischer wrote: : SuSE once had a script /etc/routes which was ideal for that kind : of setup. I've missed it badly on Debian. : : shameless plug : Please do try the

Bug#368228: About your wish for ifupdown changes...

2007-12-27 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:59:59PM +0100, Claus Fischer wrote: SuSE once had a script /etc/routes which was ideal for that kind of setup. I've missed it badly on Debian. shameless plug Please do try the ifupdown-extra package. It's not very well document but the