Bug#372901: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#372901: problem with setting multiple blocks in /etc/apt/preferences

2006-09-19 Thread Sven Mueller
Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Mattia Dongili wrote: > >> yes, for this reason I'd prefer using a dot-only line used as separator, > ... >> This is common already in debian packaging files (and probably others) >> and doesn't impose any other constraint. > > Sounds sensible. I wouldn't require that.

Bug#372901: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#372901: problem with setting multiple blocks in /etc/apt/preferences

2006-09-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Mattia Dongili wrote: > yes, for this reason I'd prefer using a dot-only line used as separator, ... > This is common already in debian packaging files (and probably others) > and doesn't impose any other constraint. Sounds sensible. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Bug#372901: [Pkg-uml-pkgs] Bug#372901: problem with setting multiple blocks in /etc/apt/preferences

2006-09-17 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 06:03:46PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > reopen 372901 > thanks > > Hi, > > unfortunately ConfigParser.py does not preserve empty lines indented > with whitespace, so setting something like > > preferences= > Packages: * > Pin: release unstable > Pin-Priority: 300 >