also sprach Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.11.04.1404 +0100]:
map !disconnected
I guess this is as good as it'll get. Possibly actually better than
my initial thought. Thanks,
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:10:01AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Here's a reason whyI want this feature:
[...]
Now I want to be able to say that the disconnected test does not
apply to the wifi $IFACE. I can thus limit the wifi mapping to the
other tests (as you suggest), but then every time
also sprach Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.25.2355 +0200]:
The way I understand ifupdown to work is to provide configuration
stanzas that don't know about the actual names of the physical
interfaces, and mapping stanza that define the mapping. So I'll
limit myself to that.
Here's a
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:10:01AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Remembering that you said that guessnet works by favourising stanzas
for which multiple commands succeed, I tried to add
test command [ $IFACE != wifi ]
but ifupdown does not like that:
lapse:~# ifup wifi
reopen 374326
tag 374326 wontfix
thanks
* Enrico Zini [Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:55:51 +0100]:
However, please feel free to reopen the bug. I'll tag it wontfix, but
I'll be happy to apply a patch that closes it if someone provides it.
I would like this. Both the feature and the bug to stay open,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:41:27PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
If it's not too much trouble, maybe we could implement a limit-to
keyword, which takes interface names as arguments. Then, when
guessnet runs, it only runs tests without limits or where the limit
set includes the interface to be
also sprach Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.25.1524 +0100]:
This is something you can do by limiting the candidate profiles for an
interface in the mapping stanza.
No, that's the wrong way around. :)
I know I can use limits in the mapping stanza, but i really would
like to be able to
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:32:11PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.25.1524 +0100]:
This is something you can do by limiting the candidate profiles for an
interface in the mapping stanza.
No, that's the wrong way around. :)
I know I can use
Package: guessnet
Version: 0.38-1.1
Severity: wishlist
If it's not too much trouble, maybe we could implement a limit-to
keyword, which takes interface names as arguments. Then, when
guessnet runs, it only runs tests without limits or where the limit
set includes the interface to be configured.
9 matches
Mail list logo
