On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Olivier Couet wrote:
How do we proceed ? Do you want to first try this fix on your side to
check if it is working ? Or do you want us to do the patch and send it
to you ?
Regards. Olivier
I can go ahead and make the fix on the Debian side.
Olivier Couet wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Olivier Couet wrote:
How do we proceed ? Do you want to first try this fix on your side to
check if it is working ? Or do you want us to do the patch and send it
to you ?
Regards. Olivier
I can go ahead and make the fix on
Hi Kevin,
I understand now. Thanks for the explanation. Ian and I had a look at
this code. It appeared to us that the best would be to rename this
common block. In fact in this include file, there is two common blocks
with bad names. FD and X we propose to rename them D510FD and D510X this
should
Olivier Couet wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I understand now. Thanks for the explanation. Ian and I had a look at
this code. It appeared to us that the best would be to rename this
common block. In fact in this include file, there is two common blocks
with bad names. FD and X we propose to rename them
Olivier Couet wrote:
How do we proceed ? Do you want to first try this fix on your side to
check if it is working ? Or do you want us to do the patch and send it
to you ?
Regards. Olivier
I can go ahead and make the fix on the Debian side. Will let you know
whether there are any problems.
Kevin,
x, X , y, Y, z and Z are reversed word in the command FUN1, FUN2,
FUN/PLOT FUN/DRAW etc ... naming a function that way is not allowed.
Cheers, Olivier
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
On 6/23/06, Ian Mclaren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Kevin,
It is not
Olivier Couet wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Quite frankly I am not sure a such protection is needed. Calling a
function X, Y or Z when these keywords are known as reserved ones is
really bad programming, unless the programmer wants to make confusing
code on purpose.
Well, let me explain what leads
On 6/23/06, Ian Mclaren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Kevin,
It is not clear from your convoluted log, but I suspect this is a 64-bit
system and I have the same problem here, i.e. Comis does not work
properly. Our 64-bit systems have i386 emulation and I have put statically
linked ia32 versions
8 matches
Mail list logo
