Varun Hiremath wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 11/6/06, *Alan Woodland* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Co maintaining sounds like a good approach - I did have packages
almost
ready quite some time back, but there were a few python related issues
that needed fixing at
Hello Alan,On 11/6/06, Alan Woodland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had another quick look, and I've got a few comments:Firstly you say Architecture: any. Did you really mean this? I thinkthis should be ok as an Architecture: all package, since nothing
changes between any two architectures? If this
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alan Woodland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: flickrfs
Version : 1.2.9
Upstream Author : Manish Rai Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://manishrjain.googlepages.com/flickrfs/
* License : GPL v2
Description :
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:36:01PM +0100, Alan Woodland wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alan Woodland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: flickrfs
Version : 1.2.9
Upstream Author : Manish Rai Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:36:01 +0100
Alan Woodland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alan Woodland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: flickrfs
Version : 1.2.9
Upstream Author : Manish Rai Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
5 matches
Mail list logo