Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

2006-08-13 Thread Matej Vela
Jerome Alet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: Well, my gut feeling is that jaxml is dead upstream and not likely to be adopted (I've never had much luck contacting Victor, cf. #305460, #312834, #317408). I'll be glad to be proven wrong of

Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

2006-08-07 Thread Jerome Alet
Hi, On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : [...] Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt jaxml? And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml

Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

2006-08-01 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : retitle 380848 Python transition (#2): misnamed package with public modules thanks jaxml is a bit of an anomaly: it used a single package to provide a public module for Python 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. It's not a stand-alone application, so it should

Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

2006-08-01 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 380848 Python transition (#2): misnamed package with public modules thanks jaxml is a bit of an anomaly: it used a single package to provide a public module for Python 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. It's not a stand-alone application, so it should really, really be called python-jaxml. There are

Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

2006-08-01 Thread Matej Vela
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : [...] Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt jaxml? And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml immediately? If it's adopted and renamed, it'll have to go through NEW

Bug#380848: Renaming jaxml to python-jaxml

2006-08-01 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le mar 1 août 2006 23:45, Matej Vela a écrit : Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le mar 1 août 2006 22:42, Matej Vela a écrit : [...] Victor, as the maintainer of scanerrlog, would you like to adopt jaxml? And QA folks: can we go ahead and remove jaxml immediately? If it's